Khan Files Formal Claim in Mongolian Administrative Court, Requests Prime Minister's Assistance and Provides Update on the CNNC Offer
TORONTO, ONTARIO--(Marketwire - April 21, 2010) - Khan Resources Inc. (TSX:KRI) ("Khan") announced today that its 58%-owned Mongolian joint venture subsidiary, Central Asian Uranium Company, LLC ("CAUC") has filed a formal claim in the Capital City Administrative Court in Mongolia challenging the legal basis for the notice received from the Mongolian Nuclear Energy Agency (the "NEA") purporting to invalidate CAUC's mining license 237A. The claim asserts, among other things, that the NEA has no legal authority to make a decision to invalidate the mining license and that the NEA's purported decision to do so violates the provisions of Mongolian law. CAUC is seeking a declaration of the Court that the NEA's purported action to invalidate the mining license is itself invalid. Khan's 100%-owned Mongolian subsidiary, Khan Resources LLC ("Khan Mongolia") is in the process of preparing and intends to file a similar claim on substantially the same basis in due course in respect of the NEA's purported invalidation of Khan Mongolia's exploration license 9282X.
Khan is also continuing its ongoing efforts to engage the Mongolian Government in discussions concerning its treatment by the NEA in general and the unlawful license invalidation notices in particular. Khan recently wrote directly to the Prime Minister of Mongolia, Mr. Sukhbaatar Batbold, formally requesting that he exercise his authority to review and overturn the NEA's purported decision to invalidate the licenses and put an end to the other inappropriate actions being taken by the NEA against Khan and its subsidiaries over the past several months. A copy of this letter is included with this press release, which investors are urged to read carefully and in its entirety, as it contains important information and background which will assist shareholders to understand the basis for the claims and the nature of the challenges we face in Mongolia.
Khan intends to continue to challenge the NEA's actions through all legally available means. In addition to filing the claims, Khan and its legal counsel intend to vigorously defend its and its subsidiaries' rights and interests, and to pursue all available rights and remedies in the Canadian and Mongolian courts and, if necessary, in international arbitration.
Khan also reminds shareholders that the friendly take-over bid (the "CNNC Offer") by CNNC Overseas Uranium Holding Ltd. ("CNNC") to acquire the outstanding common shares of Khan at a price of C$0.96 in cash per share is still outstanding and open for acceptance. As previously disclosed by CNNC, the CNNC Offer has been extended until May 25, 2010 in order to allow CNNC more time to obtain the necessary approvals for the CNNC Offer from the Government of China. In the Support Agreement between the parties, CNNC has undertaken to use its commercially reasonable efforts to obtain all required Chinese approvals in order to satisfy this condition to the CNNC Offer and to keep Khan reasonably informed as to the status of the proceedings to obtain such approvals. Based on discussions with CNNC and the terms of the Support Agreement, Khan has no new information to indicate that the purported NEA invalidation notices and other recent events in Mongolia will adversely impact CNNC's ability to obtain Chinese Government approval or the likelihood of the CNNC Offer proceeding. CNNC has informed Khan that it continues its efforts to obtain all required Chinese approvals.
The Board of Directors continues to stand behind its unanimous recommendation that shareholders tender their shares to the CNNC Offer, for all of the reasons set out in the Directors' Circular dated February 25, 2010. Among other things, the CNNC Offer provides a 118% premium to the closing share price prior to the announcement of the hostile take-over bid by Atomredmetzoloto JSC ("ARMZ") and a 48% premium over the unsolicited $0.65 per share price under the ARMZ bid launched on November 30, 2009. The CNNC Offer was the culmination of a lengthy and intense process during which the Board sought out and carefully considered a variety of strategic alternatives following the unsolicited ARMZ bid. In light of the ARMZ bid, which exacerbated the regulatory and political uncertainty in Mongolia, and in weighing available alternatives, the Board of Directors was highly sensitive to the risks of supporting a strategic transaction with a potential buyer that was conditional upon Mongolian approval or the occurrence or non-occurrence of any regulatory or political event in Mongolia. The Support Agreement with CNNC met this criteria and the Board determined that the CNNC Offer was the best available alternative in the circumstances. As previously expressed by the Board in the above-mentioned Directors' Circular, the conditions to the CNNC Offer were carefully negotiated by Khan to more appropriately reflect the nature of Khan's business and the unique circumstances in which it operates in Mongolia, to create a greater likelihood that the CNNC Offer will be completed. For example, under the Support Agreement, the CNNC Offer is not conditional upon the continued existence or re-registration of the Dornod licenses or on approval of the Government of Mongolia or any agency thereof. While the CNNC Offer is conditional on, among other things, there having not occurred a "material adverse change" in respect of Khan, the scope of what constitutes a "material adverse change" was also carefully considered and limited by the parties so as to exclude a variety of events or occurrences in Mongolia that are outside of the control of Khan but that could otherwise have a material adverse effect on Khan and its subsidiaries, including any expropriation of Khan's properties or assets.
Shareholders are also reminded that all members of the Board of Directors and certain executive officers of Khan have agreed to lock-up their common shares, along with any common shares issued upon the exercise of options, in favour of CNNC, as further described in the Directors' Circular.
Shareholders are encouraged to read the Directors' Circular dated February 25, 2010 as it provides important background information to the CNNC Offer and the rationale for acceptance of it, and the Support Agreement dated February 1, 2010, both of which have been filed on SEDAR and are available at www.sedar.com. Shareholders are urged to review the Support Agreement and the Directors' Circular carefully.
Khan will provide further updates to its investors as more information becomes available.
Khan Resources Inc. (TSX:KRI) is a Canadian company engaged in the acquisition, exploration and development of uranium properties. Its current activities are focused on the Dornod area in northeastern Mongolia, the site of a former Russian open-pit uranium mine. Khan holds interests in the Main Dornod Property and in the Additional Dornod Property. Khan's website is www.khanresources.com.
Forward-Looking Statements and Information
This press release may contain forward-looking statements and forward-looking information, which are subject to certain risks, uncertainties and assumptions. Forward-looking statements and information are characterized by words such as "will", "plan", "expect", "project", "intend", "believe", "anticipate", "forecast", "schedule", "estimate" and similar expressions, or statements that certain events or conditions "may" or "will" occur. Forward-looking statements and information are not historical facts and are based upon a number of estimates and assumptions and are inherently subject to significant business, social, economic, political, regulatory, competitive and other risks and uncertainties, contingencies and other factors, including the impact of International, Mongolian and Canadian laws, trade agreements and regulatory requirements on the CNNC Offer and Khan's business, properties, licenses, operations and capital structure, Khan's ability to re-register or re-instate the Dornod licenses, regulatory uncertainty and obtaining governmental and regulatory approvals for the CNNC Offer, legislative, political, social, regulatory and economic developments or changes in jurisdictions in which Khan and CNNC carry on business, the speculative nature of exploration and development, risks involved in the exploration, development and mining business, changes in market conditions, changes or disruptions in the securities markets and market fluctuations in prices for Khan securities, the existence of third parties interested in purchasing some or all of Khan's shares or assets, the satisfaction or waiver of the conditions to the CNNC Offer, the extent to which holders of shares determine to tender their shares to the CNNC Offer, the anticipated benefits of the CNNC Offer, litigation and other legal proceedings, the method of funding and availability of potential alternative strategic transactions involving Khan, including those transactions that may produce superior strategic value to shareholders, the need to obtain and maintain licenses and permits and comply with national and international laws, regulations, treaties or other similar requirements, and uncertainty in the estimation of mineral reserves and resources. In addition, a number of other factors could cause actual results to differ materially from the results discussed in such statements and information, and there is no assurance that actual results will be consistent with them. For further details, reference is made to the risk factors discussed or referred to in Khan's annual and interim management's discussion and analyses and Annual Information Form on file with the Canadian securities regulatory authorities and available on SEDAR at www.sedar.com. Such forward-looking statements and information are made or given as at the date of this news release, and Khan assumes no obligation to update or revise them, either publicly or otherwise, to reflect new events, information or circumstances, except as may be required under applicable securities law.
Any questions concerning Khan or the CNNC Offer may be directed to the information agent as follows:
Dear Prime Minister Batbold:
I am writing to you to formally protest the ongoing unlawful and unjust actions being taken by the Nuclear Energy Agency of Mongolia (the "NEA") against Khan Resources Inc. ("Khan") and its Mongolian subsidiaries Central Asian Uranium Company, LLC ("CAUC") and Khan Mongolia LLC ("Khan Mongolia"). Recently, the NEA issued notices which purport to invalidate the Dornod uranium property mining license 237A (the "Mining License") held by CAUC and the exploration license 9282X (the "Exploration License") held by Khan Mongolia (together, the "Licenses"). Khan believes that the invalidations are without legal foundation and are a clear violation of Khan's rights and interests under the laws of Mongolia, and are in breach of Mongolia's obligations under international law. Our lawyers are preparing to bring legal action against the NEA to challenge the invalidation notices and other actions. We would prefer not to do so. Litigation will be costly and, we believe, embarrassing to the Government of Mongolia. Accordingly we are writing this letter in the hope that you will exercise your authority to review and overturn the NEA's decision.
By way of background, Khan is a Canadian-based public company with its shares listed on the Toronto Stock Exchange (the "TSX") and a significant Canadian and international investor-base. A majority of Khan's operations and assets are located in the Republic of Mongolia, where we have been carrying on uranium development activities since 2004. CAUC is a joint venture company of which Khan indirectly owns 58%, MonAtom LLC ("MonAtom") owns 21%, and a subsidiary of Atomredmetzoloto JSC ("ARMZ") owns 21%. CAUC has held the Mining License since 1997, and Khan Mongolia has held the Exploration License since 2005.
As you know, the Dornod uranium property is one of the most significant undeveloped uranium properties in the world. Khan and its subsidiaries have made considerable capital investments in Mongolia (over US$20 million) in developing the Dornod uranium property to date. Over the past several years, we have taken numerous steps to advance the development of the property by undertaking exploration and drilling work, establishing a power line, settling pond and permanent camp at the site, and completing an environment impact assessment, a pre-feasibility study and a definitive feasibility study. We employ over 18 Mongolian citizens and no expatriates in our Ulaan Baatar and Dornod offices. Our Executive Director and Country Manager is Mongolian. We have been very proud ambassadors for your country. In raising over Cdn$40 million on the TSX from Canadian, U.S. and international investors during the past 5 years, we have spoken very positively about Mongolia at various investor conferences, with the North American financial press and individual investors. We completed a definitive feasibility study last year which established that the Dornod uranium project is highly valuable. Based on this we were confident that investors would recognize the value we had created in Khan, and we would be able to raise the large amounts of capital required to build the project. Khan's development plan for building and operating the project would involve an investment of over $300 million in Mongolia, and would provide employment for hundreds of Mongolians, as well as significant royalty, tax and other benefits to the Mongolian Government.
Unfortunately, the regulatory uncertainty associated with our licences in Mongolia has significantly affected our stock price and our ability to raise financing over the past few years. The latest action by the NEA has caused many of our investors to sell their shares and has driven our stock price down by about 45%. Meanwhile, development of the Dornod uranium project continues to be delayed, not only to the detriment of Khan, but also to the detriment of Mongolia.
We thought it might be useful to set out some of the background and recent history relating to Khan and its Licenses, some of which you will already be aware of, in the hopes that this information will motivate you to closely examine and assist us in rectifying the NEA's unlawful actions.
In July 2009, CAUC was informed by the Mineral Resources Authority of Mongolia ("MRAM") that the Mining License (and only the Mining License) had been temporarily suspended due to CAUC's alleged violation of applicable laws cited by inspectors from the Mongolian State Specialized Inspection Agency (the "SSIA") based on their visit to the Dornod site in mid-April 2009. The principal violation cited was that CAUC had not registered its deposit reserves with the State Integrated Registry for approval by the Minerals Professional Council. In fact, CAUC had submitted the deposit reserve and resource calculation for registration initially in 2007 and again in 2008, but the Minerals Professional Council had never (and to this day has not) held the requisite meeting to consider the calculation and prepare the requisite report. Following receipt of such notice, CAUC met and communicated with SSIA representatives on several occasions and responded to each of the alleged violations cited by the SSIA and continued to work cooperatively with the Mongolian authorities to resolve any allegations surrounding the Mining License or CAUC's activities in Mongolia. In January 2010, CAUC reached a settlement with MRAM in which the temporary suspension was terminated. Khan views this settlement as having finally resolved the July 2009 suspension of the Mining License, despite subsequent reports circulated by the NEA that the settlement is not valid.
As you know, shortly after the July 2009 Mining License suspension, the Mongolian Parliament passed the Nuclear Energy Law, which, among other things, entitles the Government of Mongolia to take ownership, without compensation, of not less than 51% (if the resources were developed with State funds) or 34% (if the resources were developed without State funds) of the shares of a license holder. The new law also gave the Government the right to revoke outstanding licenses if the license holders did not agree to abide by these provisions and submit applications in the required form to re-register their existing licenses in accordance with the new law by November 15, 2009. On October 8, 2009, CAUC and Khan received notices (the "October 8 Notices") which stated that in connection with the implementation of the Nuclear Energy Law, the existing Licenses should be considered invalidated, and that CAUC and Khan Mongolia should not take any activities under the Licenses until they obtained new licenses from the NEA under the new law. Khan inquired as to the grounds and consequences of such invalidations, and was informed by the NEA that all licenses held by all uranium license holders in Mongolia had been temporarily suspended in October 2009, pending re-registration of such licenses under the Nuclear Energy Law. Accordingly, Khan understood the October 8 Notices were an administrative matter that meant only that its Licenses, like those of all other Mongolian license-holders, were in limbo pending re-registration under the new law.
In November 2009, Khan submitted lengthy and detailed applications for re-registration of its Licenses before the prescribed deadline. The applications complied with the requirements of the new law, including the requirement to state that the license holder accepted the ability of the Mongolian State to take an ownership interest in the license-holder without compensation. In particular, despite that this provision of the Nuclear Energy Law has been challenged by the Mongolian Mining Association and others, Khan and CAUC made a decision to accept it and to work cooperatively with the Mongolian State-owned uranium company MonAtom on a basis that would give MonAtom a 51% ownership interest in each of the entities that own the Licenses.
In January 2010, CAUC received a notice from the State Property Committee requiring CAUC to submit to its shareholders a resolution approving an increase in MonAtom's ownership of CAUC from 21% to 51%. The resolution was passed by a 79% majority. Khan and MonAtom voted in favour of the resolution. ARMZ, the owner of the other 21% of CAUC, refused to vote in favour of the resolution.
Further, in January 2010 Khan entered into a non-binding memorandum of understanding ("MOU") with MonAtom which would have resolved all of the regulatory and ownership issues surrounding the Dornod project to the mutual benefit of Khan and the Mongolian Government. The MOU was the result of extensive negotiations with senior members of MonAtom and was designed to comply with the Nuclear Energy Law. Khan understood that the MOU had the approval of senior members of the Mongolian Government. Among other things, the MOU contemplated giving the Government of Mongolia a 51% interest in the project, as required under the Nuclear Energy Law, and paved the way to a full blown investment agreement with the Government of Mongolia patterned off of the successful investment agreement recently entered into between the Mongolian Government and Ivanhoe Mines in respect of the Oyu Tolgoi gold and copper project, all with a view to further advancing the development of the Dornod project towards production.
A key condition to the MOU was that the Licences would be re-registered under the Nuclear Energy Law by no later than January 29, 2010. We understand, however, that the NEA opposed the MOU and that the Government was under tremendous political pressure from Russia not to re-register the Licenses. On or about January 29, 2010, the NEA publicly stated that the MOU was invalid and contrary to the laws of Mongolia. When it became apparent that the Government of Mongolia was not able or willing to honour the MOU, and in the face of the threat of a then-outstanding hostile take-over bid by ARMZ, Khan was left with no alternative but to negotiate a friendly transaction with CNNC Overseas Uranium Holding Ltd., a subsidiary of China National Nuclear Corporation ("CNNC"), whereby CNNC agreed to make a superior offer to acquire all of the outstanding shares of Khan.
In response to the CNNC offer, the NEA began circulating reports to the public that the Nuclear Energy Law requires that NEA approval be obtained for the CNNC offer, citing Articles 7.1 and 7.2 of the Nuclear Energy Law, and that Khan was in violation of this requirement. With greatest respect, these statements are not correct as a matter of Mongolian law. The Nuclear Energy Law applies only to transfers of shares of direct Mongolian license-holders. The CNNC offer is only for the shares of Khan (a Canadian company) and does not involve any sale or transfer of the shares of CAUC or Khan Mongolia. Accordingly, we respectfully submit that nothing under the CNNC offer requires approval of the NEA or any other Governmental or regulatory authority in Mongolia.
You may not be aware of this, but the NEA has also recently sent a highly inflammatory and inaccurate notice to the TSX (a copy of which is enclosed). The notice was clearly an attempt to embarrass Khan, and served no legitimate or legal purpose. We bring this to your attention not only to protest the NEA's action, but also to make you aware of the inappropriate behaviour exhibited by the NEA, an agency of the Government of Mongolia. I'm sure that you recognize that this action by the NEA was highly inappropriate and actually harms the credibility of the Mongolian Government and political system.
Turning now to the recent NEA invalidation notices themselves, the NEA now alleges that the Licenses were in fact invalidated on October 8, 2009 because of failures to address violations of Mongolian law stemming from the July 2009 report issued by an inspection team appointed by the SSIA in respect of the Mining License. With greatest respect, the NEA's position is demonstrably false, and extremely troubling. Notwithstanding the assurances received from the NEA in October 2009 that the October 8 Notices were common to all license holders and the suspensions were temporary in nature pending re-registration of licenses under the new law, the NEA is now, several months later, alleging that the October 2009 invalidations of the Licenses were actually on the basis of violations cited in the July 2009 SSIA report. Even without those assurances, the language of the October 8, 2009 Notices themselves contradicts the NEA position. Moreover, the July SSIA report only pertained to the Mining License, not the Exploration License. It is therefore improper for the NEA to now also suggest that the Exploration License had been invalidated due to alleged failures by CAUC.
Finally, if it were true that the Licenses had been invalidated on October 8, 2009, none of the following subsequent actions by the NEA and other government agencies make any logical sense:
Mr. Prime Minister, our company fully recognizes and supports the power of the Government of Mongolia and other State authorities to conduct inspection and examine the activities of Khan and its subsidiaries operating in Mongolia and we have fully cooperated with them to enable them to make such inspection and responded to all of their requests. We also fully understand and support the power and interest the Government and Parliament of Mongolia have in ensuring that the people of Mongolia benefit from the exploitation of Mongolia's resources. However, we must protest the NEA's actions, which are clearly unlawful and, we believe, politically motivated. Khan has respected the laws of Mongolia and we believed we had reached a mutually beneficial agreement in the MOU. Given the extreme damage we have suffered due to the NEA's actions, however, we now have no choice but to seek all available legal recourse, including in the Canadian and Mongolian courts and in international arbitration. We would also have no choice, as a Canadian public company with extensive disclosure obligations to our investors, but to continue to publicly disclose the nature and details of the NEA's unlawful actions and the legal proceedings that we intend to bring and the events leading up to them. We would expect that this matter will be closely observed by the numerous international mining companies operating and investing in Mongolia, and, unfortunately, is likely to adversely impact foreign investors' willingness to invest in the Republic of Mongolia and significantly delay or prevent any further development of the Dornod uranium property, pending resolution of all legal proceedings with respect to the NEA License invalidation. We believe that the NEA's behaviour will also have a significantly negative impact on the reputation of Mongolia as a place for foreign companies to carry on business, and on its reputation in the Canadian and international markets.
We appeal to you to exercise your constitutional authority to review and overturn the recent decision by the NEA to invalidate the Mining License and the Exploration License and put an end to the unlawful actions being taken by the NEA against Khan and its subsidiaries. We would appreciate an opportunity to speak directly with you and members of your staff concerning this serious matter at your earliest convenience.
Thanking you in advance for you assistance in this matter. I am available to speak at your convenience at (416) 360-3405 and would be happy to coordinate an in-person meeting with you in Mongolia.
Yours very truly,
(signed) Martin Quick
Khan is also continuing its ongoing efforts to engage the Mongolian Government in discussions concerning its treatment by the NEA in general and the unlawful license invalidation notices in particular. Khan recently wrote directly to the Prime Minister of Mongolia, Mr. Sukhbaatar Batbold, formally requesting that he exercise his authority to review and overturn the NEA's purported decision to invalidate the licenses and put an end to the other inappropriate actions being taken by the NEA against Khan and its subsidiaries over the past several months. A copy of this letter is included with this press release, which investors are urged to read carefully and in its entirety, as it contains important information and background which will assist shareholders to understand the basis for the claims and the nature of the challenges we face in Mongolia.
Khan intends to continue to challenge the NEA's actions through all legally available means. In addition to filing the claims, Khan and its legal counsel intend to vigorously defend its and its subsidiaries' rights and interests, and to pursue all available rights and remedies in the Canadian and Mongolian courts and, if necessary, in international arbitration.
Khan also reminds shareholders that the friendly take-over bid (the "CNNC Offer") by CNNC Overseas Uranium Holding Ltd. ("CNNC") to acquire the outstanding common shares of Khan at a price of C$0.96 in cash per share is still outstanding and open for acceptance. As previously disclosed by CNNC, the CNNC Offer has been extended until May 25, 2010 in order to allow CNNC more time to obtain the necessary approvals for the CNNC Offer from the Government of China. In the Support Agreement between the parties, CNNC has undertaken to use its commercially reasonable efforts to obtain all required Chinese approvals in order to satisfy this condition to the CNNC Offer and to keep Khan reasonably informed as to the status of the proceedings to obtain such approvals. Based on discussions with CNNC and the terms of the Support Agreement, Khan has no new information to indicate that the purported NEA invalidation notices and other recent events in Mongolia will adversely impact CNNC's ability to obtain Chinese Government approval or the likelihood of the CNNC Offer proceeding. CNNC has informed Khan that it continues its efforts to obtain all required Chinese approvals.
The Board of Directors continues to stand behind its unanimous recommendation that shareholders tender their shares to the CNNC Offer, for all of the reasons set out in the Directors' Circular dated February 25, 2010. Among other things, the CNNC Offer provides a 118% premium to the closing share price prior to the announcement of the hostile take-over bid by Atomredmetzoloto JSC ("ARMZ") and a 48% premium over the unsolicited $0.65 per share price under the ARMZ bid launched on November 30, 2009. The CNNC Offer was the culmination of a lengthy and intense process during which the Board sought out and carefully considered a variety of strategic alternatives following the unsolicited ARMZ bid. In light of the ARMZ bid, which exacerbated the regulatory and political uncertainty in Mongolia, and in weighing available alternatives, the Board of Directors was highly sensitive to the risks of supporting a strategic transaction with a potential buyer that was conditional upon Mongolian approval or the occurrence or non-occurrence of any regulatory or political event in Mongolia. The Support Agreement with CNNC met this criteria and the Board determined that the CNNC Offer was the best available alternative in the circumstances. As previously expressed by the Board in the above-mentioned Directors' Circular, the conditions to the CNNC Offer were carefully negotiated by Khan to more appropriately reflect the nature of Khan's business and the unique circumstances in which it operates in Mongolia, to create a greater likelihood that the CNNC Offer will be completed. For example, under the Support Agreement, the CNNC Offer is not conditional upon the continued existence or re-registration of the Dornod licenses or on approval of the Government of Mongolia or any agency thereof. While the CNNC Offer is conditional on, among other things, there having not occurred a "material adverse change" in respect of Khan, the scope of what constitutes a "material adverse change" was also carefully considered and limited by the parties so as to exclude a variety of events or occurrences in Mongolia that are outside of the control of Khan but that could otherwise have a material adverse effect on Khan and its subsidiaries, including any expropriation of Khan's properties or assets.
Shareholders are also reminded that all members of the Board of Directors and certain executive officers of Khan have agreed to lock-up their common shares, along with any common shares issued upon the exercise of options, in favour of CNNC, as further described in the Directors' Circular.
Shareholders are encouraged to read the Directors' Circular dated February 25, 2010 as it provides important background information to the CNNC Offer and the rationale for acceptance of it, and the Support Agreement dated February 1, 2010, both of which have been filed on SEDAR and are available at www.sedar.com. Shareholders are urged to review the Support Agreement and the Directors' Circular carefully.
Khan will provide further updates to its investors as more information becomes available.
Khan Resources Inc. (TSX:KRI) is a Canadian company engaged in the acquisition, exploration and development of uranium properties. Its current activities are focused on the Dornod area in northeastern Mongolia, the site of a former Russian open-pit uranium mine. Khan holds interests in the Main Dornod Property and in the Additional Dornod Property. Khan's website is www.khanresources.com.
Forward-Looking Statements and Information
This press release may contain forward-looking statements and forward-looking information, which are subject to certain risks, uncertainties and assumptions. Forward-looking statements and information are characterized by words such as "will", "plan", "expect", "project", "intend", "believe", "anticipate", "forecast", "schedule", "estimate" and similar expressions, or statements that certain events or conditions "may" or "will" occur. Forward-looking statements and information are not historical facts and are based upon a number of estimates and assumptions and are inherently subject to significant business, social, economic, political, regulatory, competitive and other risks and uncertainties, contingencies and other factors, including the impact of International, Mongolian and Canadian laws, trade agreements and regulatory requirements on the CNNC Offer and Khan's business, properties, licenses, operations and capital structure, Khan's ability to re-register or re-instate the Dornod licenses, regulatory uncertainty and obtaining governmental and regulatory approvals for the CNNC Offer, legislative, political, social, regulatory and economic developments or changes in jurisdictions in which Khan and CNNC carry on business, the speculative nature of exploration and development, risks involved in the exploration, development and mining business, changes in market conditions, changes or disruptions in the securities markets and market fluctuations in prices for Khan securities, the existence of third parties interested in purchasing some or all of Khan's shares or assets, the satisfaction or waiver of the conditions to the CNNC Offer, the extent to which holders of shares determine to tender their shares to the CNNC Offer, the anticipated benefits of the CNNC Offer, litigation and other legal proceedings, the method of funding and availability of potential alternative strategic transactions involving Khan, including those transactions that may produce superior strategic value to shareholders, the need to obtain and maintain licenses and permits and comply with national and international laws, regulations, treaties or other similar requirements, and uncertainty in the estimation of mineral reserves and resources. In addition, a number of other factors could cause actual results to differ materially from the results discussed in such statements and information, and there is no assurance that actual results will be consistent with them. For further details, reference is made to the risk factors discussed or referred to in Khan's annual and interim management's discussion and analyses and Annual Information Form on file with the Canadian securities regulatory authorities and available on SEDAR at www.sedar.com. Such forward-looking statements and information are made or given as at the date of this news release, and Khan assumes no obligation to update or revise them, either publicly or otherwise, to reflect new events, information or circumstances, except as may be required under applicable securities law.
Any questions concerning Khan or the CNNC Offer may be directed to the information agent as follows:
| Georgeson |
| 100 University Avenue |
| 11th Floor, South Tower |
| Toronto, Ontario |
| M5J 2Y1 |
| North American Toll-Free Number: 1-866-374-9877 |
| Banks and Brokers and Collect Number: 1-212-806-6859 |
| Email:gsproxygroup@gscorp.com |
APPENDIX A
Letter to the Prime Minister of Mongolia
April 15, 2010| Mr. Sukhbaatar Batbold |
| Prime Minister of Mongolia |
| Ulaan Bataar |
| Mongolia |
I am writing to you to formally protest the ongoing unlawful and unjust actions being taken by the Nuclear Energy Agency of Mongolia (the "NEA") against Khan Resources Inc. ("Khan") and its Mongolian subsidiaries Central Asian Uranium Company, LLC ("CAUC") and Khan Mongolia LLC ("Khan Mongolia"). Recently, the NEA issued notices which purport to invalidate the Dornod uranium property mining license 237A (the "Mining License") held by CAUC and the exploration license 9282X (the "Exploration License") held by Khan Mongolia (together, the "Licenses"). Khan believes that the invalidations are without legal foundation and are a clear violation of Khan's rights and interests under the laws of Mongolia, and are in breach of Mongolia's obligations under international law. Our lawyers are preparing to bring legal action against the NEA to challenge the invalidation notices and other actions. We would prefer not to do so. Litigation will be costly and, we believe, embarrassing to the Government of Mongolia. Accordingly we are writing this letter in the hope that you will exercise your authority to review and overturn the NEA's decision.
By way of background, Khan is a Canadian-based public company with its shares listed on the Toronto Stock Exchange (the "TSX") and a significant Canadian and international investor-base. A majority of Khan's operations and assets are located in the Republic of Mongolia, where we have been carrying on uranium development activities since 2004. CAUC is a joint venture company of which Khan indirectly owns 58%, MonAtom LLC ("MonAtom") owns 21%, and a subsidiary of Atomredmetzoloto JSC ("ARMZ") owns 21%. CAUC has held the Mining License since 1997, and Khan Mongolia has held the Exploration License since 2005.
As you know, the Dornod uranium property is one of the most significant undeveloped uranium properties in the world. Khan and its subsidiaries have made considerable capital investments in Mongolia (over US$20 million) in developing the Dornod uranium property to date. Over the past several years, we have taken numerous steps to advance the development of the property by undertaking exploration and drilling work, establishing a power line, settling pond and permanent camp at the site, and completing an environment impact assessment, a pre-feasibility study and a definitive feasibility study. We employ over 18 Mongolian citizens and no expatriates in our Ulaan Baatar and Dornod offices. Our Executive Director and Country Manager is Mongolian. We have been very proud ambassadors for your country. In raising over Cdn$40 million on the TSX from Canadian, U.S. and international investors during the past 5 years, we have spoken very positively about Mongolia at various investor conferences, with the North American financial press and individual investors. We completed a definitive feasibility study last year which established that the Dornod uranium project is highly valuable. Based on this we were confident that investors would recognize the value we had created in Khan, and we would be able to raise the large amounts of capital required to build the project. Khan's development plan for building and operating the project would involve an investment of over $300 million in Mongolia, and would provide employment for hundreds of Mongolians, as well as significant royalty, tax and other benefits to the Mongolian Government.
Unfortunately, the regulatory uncertainty associated with our licences in Mongolia has significantly affected our stock price and our ability to raise financing over the past few years. The latest action by the NEA has caused many of our investors to sell their shares and has driven our stock price down by about 45%. Meanwhile, development of the Dornod uranium project continues to be delayed, not only to the detriment of Khan, but also to the detriment of Mongolia.
We thought it might be useful to set out some of the background and recent history relating to Khan and its Licenses, some of which you will already be aware of, in the hopes that this information will motivate you to closely examine and assist us in rectifying the NEA's unlawful actions.
In July 2009, CAUC was informed by the Mineral Resources Authority of Mongolia ("MRAM") that the Mining License (and only the Mining License) had been temporarily suspended due to CAUC's alleged violation of applicable laws cited by inspectors from the Mongolian State Specialized Inspection Agency (the "SSIA") based on their visit to the Dornod site in mid-April 2009. The principal violation cited was that CAUC had not registered its deposit reserves with the State Integrated Registry for approval by the Minerals Professional Council. In fact, CAUC had submitted the deposit reserve and resource calculation for registration initially in 2007 and again in 2008, but the Minerals Professional Council had never (and to this day has not) held the requisite meeting to consider the calculation and prepare the requisite report. Following receipt of such notice, CAUC met and communicated with SSIA representatives on several occasions and responded to each of the alleged violations cited by the SSIA and continued to work cooperatively with the Mongolian authorities to resolve any allegations surrounding the Mining License or CAUC's activities in Mongolia. In January 2010, CAUC reached a settlement with MRAM in which the temporary suspension was terminated. Khan views this settlement as having finally resolved the July 2009 suspension of the Mining License, despite subsequent reports circulated by the NEA that the settlement is not valid.
As you know, shortly after the July 2009 Mining License suspension, the Mongolian Parliament passed the Nuclear Energy Law, which, among other things, entitles the Government of Mongolia to take ownership, without compensation, of not less than 51% (if the resources were developed with State funds) or 34% (if the resources were developed without State funds) of the shares of a license holder. The new law also gave the Government the right to revoke outstanding licenses if the license holders did not agree to abide by these provisions and submit applications in the required form to re-register their existing licenses in accordance with the new law by November 15, 2009. On October 8, 2009, CAUC and Khan received notices (the "October 8 Notices") which stated that in connection with the implementation of the Nuclear Energy Law, the existing Licenses should be considered invalidated, and that CAUC and Khan Mongolia should not take any activities under the Licenses until they obtained new licenses from the NEA under the new law. Khan inquired as to the grounds and consequences of such invalidations, and was informed by the NEA that all licenses held by all uranium license holders in Mongolia had been temporarily suspended in October 2009, pending re-registration of such licenses under the Nuclear Energy Law. Accordingly, Khan understood the October 8 Notices were an administrative matter that meant only that its Licenses, like those of all other Mongolian license-holders, were in limbo pending re-registration under the new law.
In November 2009, Khan submitted lengthy and detailed applications for re-registration of its Licenses before the prescribed deadline. The applications complied with the requirements of the new law, including the requirement to state that the license holder accepted the ability of the Mongolian State to take an ownership interest in the license-holder without compensation. In particular, despite that this provision of the Nuclear Energy Law has been challenged by the Mongolian Mining Association and others, Khan and CAUC made a decision to accept it and to work cooperatively with the Mongolian State-owned uranium company MonAtom on a basis that would give MonAtom a 51% ownership interest in each of the entities that own the Licenses.
In January 2010, CAUC received a notice from the State Property Committee requiring CAUC to submit to its shareholders a resolution approving an increase in MonAtom's ownership of CAUC from 21% to 51%. The resolution was passed by a 79% majority. Khan and MonAtom voted in favour of the resolution. ARMZ, the owner of the other 21% of CAUC, refused to vote in favour of the resolution.
Further, in January 2010 Khan entered into a non-binding memorandum of understanding ("MOU") with MonAtom which would have resolved all of the regulatory and ownership issues surrounding the Dornod project to the mutual benefit of Khan and the Mongolian Government. The MOU was the result of extensive negotiations with senior members of MonAtom and was designed to comply with the Nuclear Energy Law. Khan understood that the MOU had the approval of senior members of the Mongolian Government. Among other things, the MOU contemplated giving the Government of Mongolia a 51% interest in the project, as required under the Nuclear Energy Law, and paved the way to a full blown investment agreement with the Government of Mongolia patterned off of the successful investment agreement recently entered into between the Mongolian Government and Ivanhoe Mines in respect of the Oyu Tolgoi gold and copper project, all with a view to further advancing the development of the Dornod project towards production.
A key condition to the MOU was that the Licences would be re-registered under the Nuclear Energy Law by no later than January 29, 2010. We understand, however, that the NEA opposed the MOU and that the Government was under tremendous political pressure from Russia not to re-register the Licenses. On or about January 29, 2010, the NEA publicly stated that the MOU was invalid and contrary to the laws of Mongolia. When it became apparent that the Government of Mongolia was not able or willing to honour the MOU, and in the face of the threat of a then-outstanding hostile take-over bid by ARMZ, Khan was left with no alternative but to negotiate a friendly transaction with CNNC Overseas Uranium Holding Ltd., a subsidiary of China National Nuclear Corporation ("CNNC"), whereby CNNC agreed to make a superior offer to acquire all of the outstanding shares of Khan.
In response to the CNNC offer, the NEA began circulating reports to the public that the Nuclear Energy Law requires that NEA approval be obtained for the CNNC offer, citing Articles 7.1 and 7.2 of the Nuclear Energy Law, and that Khan was in violation of this requirement. With greatest respect, these statements are not correct as a matter of Mongolian law. The Nuclear Energy Law applies only to transfers of shares of direct Mongolian license-holders. The CNNC offer is only for the shares of Khan (a Canadian company) and does not involve any sale or transfer of the shares of CAUC or Khan Mongolia. Accordingly, we respectfully submit that nothing under the CNNC offer requires approval of the NEA or any other Governmental or regulatory authority in Mongolia.
You may not be aware of this, but the NEA has also recently sent a highly inflammatory and inaccurate notice to the TSX (a copy of which is enclosed). The notice was clearly an attempt to embarrass Khan, and served no legitimate or legal purpose. We bring this to your attention not only to protest the NEA's action, but also to make you aware of the inappropriate behaviour exhibited by the NEA, an agency of the Government of Mongolia. I'm sure that you recognize that this action by the NEA was highly inappropriate and actually harms the credibility of the Mongolian Government and political system.
Turning now to the recent NEA invalidation notices themselves, the NEA now alleges that the Licenses were in fact invalidated on October 8, 2009 because of failures to address violations of Mongolian law stemming from the July 2009 report issued by an inspection team appointed by the SSIA in respect of the Mining License. With greatest respect, the NEA's position is demonstrably false, and extremely troubling. Notwithstanding the assurances received from the NEA in October 2009 that the October 8 Notices were common to all license holders and the suspensions were temporary in nature pending re-registration of licenses under the new law, the NEA is now, several months later, alleging that the October 2009 invalidations of the Licenses were actually on the basis of violations cited in the July 2009 SSIA report. Even without those assurances, the language of the October 8, 2009 Notices themselves contradicts the NEA position. Moreover, the July SSIA report only pertained to the Mining License, not the Exploration License. It is therefore improper for the NEA to now also suggest that the Exploration License had been invalidated due to alleged failures by CAUC.
Finally, if it were true that the Licenses had been invalidated on October 8, 2009, none of the following subsequent actions by the NEA and other government agencies make any logical sense:
- In February, 2010, the SSIA was instructed to conduct inspections on the Licenses and to report the inspection results to the Government by April 1, 2010. As part of these inspections, representatives of CAUC met with the SSIA and provided all requested documentation.
- On March 29, 2010, CAUC was advised by SSIA Chairman Sodbaatar that further audit and inspection would be undertaken and a further report prepared. Chairman Sodbaatar said that no decision had yet been made about the Licenses and that a decision, if any, would only be made after completion of the report. Chairman Sodbaatar also indicated that the SSIA might not make any recommendation or decision at all, but instead might elevate the matter for discussion and consideration by higher-level Government authorities.
- The negotiation and signing of the MOU by MonAtom, with the full knowledge of the NEA, in January 2010.
- The report of the working group established by the Security and Foreign Policy Standing Committee of the State Great Khural in February, 2010 that recommended invalidation of uranium licenses held by numerous companies in the Dornod region.
Mr. Prime Minister, our company fully recognizes and supports the power of the Government of Mongolia and other State authorities to conduct inspection and examine the activities of Khan and its subsidiaries operating in Mongolia and we have fully cooperated with them to enable them to make such inspection and responded to all of their requests. We also fully understand and support the power and interest the Government and Parliament of Mongolia have in ensuring that the people of Mongolia benefit from the exploitation of Mongolia's resources. However, we must protest the NEA's actions, which are clearly unlawful and, we believe, politically motivated. Khan has respected the laws of Mongolia and we believed we had reached a mutually beneficial agreement in the MOU. Given the extreme damage we have suffered due to the NEA's actions, however, we now have no choice but to seek all available legal recourse, including in the Canadian and Mongolian courts and in international arbitration. We would also have no choice, as a Canadian public company with extensive disclosure obligations to our investors, but to continue to publicly disclose the nature and details of the NEA's unlawful actions and the legal proceedings that we intend to bring and the events leading up to them. We would expect that this matter will be closely observed by the numerous international mining companies operating and investing in Mongolia, and, unfortunately, is likely to adversely impact foreign investors' willingness to invest in the Republic of Mongolia and significantly delay or prevent any further development of the Dornod uranium property, pending resolution of all legal proceedings with respect to the NEA License invalidation. We believe that the NEA's behaviour will also have a significantly negative impact on the reputation of Mongolia as a place for foreign companies to carry on business, and on its reputation in the Canadian and international markets.
We appeal to you to exercise your constitutional authority to review and overturn the recent decision by the NEA to invalidate the Mining License and the Exploration License and put an end to the unlawful actions being taken by the NEA against Khan and its subsidiaries. We would appreciate an opportunity to speak directly with you and members of your staff concerning this serious matter at your earliest convenience.
Thanking you in advance for you assistance in this matter. I am available to speak at your convenience at (416) 360-3405 and would be happy to coordinate an in-person meeting with you in Mongolia.
Yours very truly,
(signed) Martin Quick
| Martin Quick |
| President and Chief Executive Officer |
| Khan Resources Inc. |
Comments
Post a Comment